search

Blake Mott vs Jake Eames Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mott vs Eames analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Blake Mott vs Jake Eames Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Mott 2 - 0 Eames

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mott has won 43.64% of points on his second serve, while Eames has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mott, in recent form, has won 54.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Eames has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.86% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Mott has saved 52.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eames has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Mott has won 69.01% of matches played (W/L 49/ 22), with Eames winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 191/ 131), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Eames has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 30/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
  • Player level: In the last year, Mott has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.68% of matches (W/L 42/ 15), where as Eames has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mott winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mott winning 4 and Eames winning 0. The last match between Mott and Eames was at the Australia F6, 29-09-2014, First, Hard with Blake Mott getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Mott and Eames have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mott winning 0 times and Eames 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mott winning 0, and Eames 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mott has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.24 while Eames has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mott has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eames has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Mott has converted 41.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eames has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365
Blake Mott

5

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

355

Rank

220

High

28

Age

R

Plays

2

Total

0

1

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

695

High

33

Age

R

Plays

Jake Eames

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

2

Total

0

1

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W W W L W L W W L

Form

L L L W L W L L L L

58% (224-165)

Career Total W/L

44% (45-58)

62% (16-10)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$133,500

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Mott VS Eames H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Blake Mott Jake Eames
All H2H Matches 2 0
Sets Won 4 0
Games Won 24 8
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (2/2) 0% (0/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (2/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (2/0)

Mott VS Eames H2h Matches played

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Blake Mott Jake Eames
YTD W/L 62% (16/10) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 57% (36/27) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 52% (306/286) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 63% (15/9) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 50% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.21 0
Aces Total 61 0
DFs per game 0.4 0
DFs Total 115 0
Avg Match Time 1:48:4 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 278.58 0
1st Serve % 71% (1249/1766) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 68% (853/1249) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 43% (224/517) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 42% (79/187) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 41% (748/1827) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/1) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 57% (4/3) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 67% (12/6) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 62% (16/26) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 83% (5/6) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 64% (7/11) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 81% (16/13) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 19% (16/3) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 30% (10/3) 0% (0/0)

Blake Mott Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Blake Mott
71% ( 30 of 42)
1st Serve %
67% ( 31 of 46)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
73% ( 22 of 30)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 15 of 31)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
20% ( 3 of 15)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
33% ( 14 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 28 of 46)
56
Total Points Won
32
L
6-1 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Blake Mott
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
72% ( 78 of 109)
1st Serve %
69% ( 68 of 99)
5
Aces
11
9
Double Faults
4
68% ( 53 of 78)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 46 of 68)
39% ( 12 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 17 of 31)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
40% ( 44 of 109)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 36 of 99)
101
Total Points Won
107
W
6-4 2-6 7-6(5) H2H
R1
cross
Blake Mott
Player
Ricardas Berankis
66% ( 41 of 62)
1st Serve %
65% ( 44 of 68)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
66% ( 27 of 41)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 23 of 44)
43% ( 9 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 9 of 24)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
42% ( 26 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 36 of 68)
72
Total Points Won
58
W
6-3 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Yshai Oliel
Player
Blake Mott
71% ( 65 of 91)
1st Serve %
87% ( 83 of 95)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69% ( 45 of 65)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 51 of 83)
50% ( 13 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
29% ( 4 of 14)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
36% ( 33 of 91)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 40 of 95)
98
Total Points Won
88
L
3-6 6-3 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60% ( 49 of 82)
1st Serve %
60% ( 52 of 86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73% ( 36 of 49)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 37 of 52)
45% ( 15 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 16 of 34)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
38% ( 31 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 33 of 86)
84
Total Points Won
84
W
6-3 1-6 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73% ( 38 of 52)
1st Serve %
73% ( 43 of 59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66% ( 25 of 38)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 23 of 43)
57% ( 8 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 5 of 16)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
37% ( 19 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 31 of 59)
64
Total Points Won
47
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Blake Mott
Player
Giles Hussey
87% ( 67 of 77)
1st Serve %
72% ( 63 of 88)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67% ( 45 of 67)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 41 of 63)
50% ( 5 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
35% ( 27 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 37 of 88)
87
Total Points Won
78
W
3-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Blake Mott
Player
Shintaro Imai
72% ( 71 of 98)
1st Serve %
63% ( 61 of 97)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
59% ( 42 of 71)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 35 of 61)
56% ( 15 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 9 of 36)
67% ( 8 of 12)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
42% ( 41 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 53 of 97)
110
Total Points Won
85
W
6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Blake Mott
Player
Michael Shaw
73% ( 49 of 67)
1st Serve %
75% ( 45 of 60)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
80% ( 39 of 49)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 31 of 45)
44% ( 8 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 5 of 15)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
30% ( 20 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 24 of 60)
71
Total Points Won
56
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Paul Jubb
Player
Blake Mott
70% ( 63 of 90)
1st Serve %
81% ( 78 of 96)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67% ( 42 of 63)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 49 of 78)
59% ( 16 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
23% ( 3 of 13)
36% ( 32 of 90)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 40 of 96)
98
Total Points Won
88
L
3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H

Jake Eames Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Jose Statham
Player
Jake Eames
67% ( 37 of 55)
1st Serve %
62% ( 53 of 86)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
84% ( 31 of 37)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 36 of 53)
78% ( 14 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 13 of 33)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
18% ( 10 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 37 of 86)
82
Total Points Won
59
L
3-6 6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Robin Stanek
Player
Jake Eames
69% ( 54 of 78)
1st Serve %
54% ( 45 of 84)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
76% ( 41 of 54)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 35 of 45)
50% ( 12 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 16 of 39)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
32% ( 25 of 78)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 33 of 84)
86
Total Points Won
76
L
7-6(2) 7-5 H2H
Q2
cross
Scott Puodziunas
Player
Jake Eames
55% ( 48 of 88)
1st Serve %
68% ( 59 of 87)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67% ( 32 of 48)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 34 of 59)
53% ( 21 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 16 of 28)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
40% ( 35 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 37 of 87)
90
Total Points Won
85
L
7-6(3) 7-5 H2H
QF
cross
Robin Stanek
Player
Jake Eames
74% ( 34 of 46)
1st Serve %
67% ( 46 of 69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
79% ( 27 of 34)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 29 of 46)
75% ( 9 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 7 of 23)
21% ( 3 of 14)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
22% ( 10 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 33 of 69)
69
Total Points Won
46
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
Q2
cross
Jake Eames
Player
Blake Ellis
50% ( 22 of 44)
1st Serve %
43% ( 17 of 40)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
77% ( 17 of 22)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
32% ( 14 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 23 of 40)
53
Total Points Won
31
W
6-1 6-1 H2H
Q2
W
4-6 6-2 6-3 H2H
QF
L
6-0 6-7(4) 6-4 H2H
R1
L
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 H2H
R1
L
6-1 3-6 6-3 H2H
R1
L
6-3 6-4 H2H

Mott Vs Eames Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions